Discussion:
Time for men is running out, act now or die!
(too old to reply)
Alpha Man
2007-09-23 02:29:59 UTC
Permalink
X-No-Archive: yes

Oh dear, guys. I'm trying to invite you to the alpha men group
since 4 months and all I get is some trolls making fun of the
alpha men movement posting their homoerotic crap on here.

Yeah, great. You men have a problem. You don't see in what
dangerous times we're living. Some of you may see it, but most men
are just whining or making fun of men who're complaining about
feminism.

But don't you see the signs? In the Western world, men are either
seen as sexual predators or criminals. Most unemployed people
are men. The feminist school system is destroying our boys.

Look, where does this lead? Men will be considered as "obsolete"
and "expendable", "worthless".Buchenwald for men! Yeah, guys,
I'm talking about the Holocaust.

If you had told a German Jew in the 1920s that by 1945 he and his family
would most likely be dead and burned to ashes, he'd have laughed.

But the situation of men in 2007 is similar to Jews in the 1920s. Jews
were the scapegoats. Today, men are the scapegoats.

Do the math. Radical feminists are extreme lesbian bulldykes. They
don't want equality, but the destruction of all men. If you don't
act now, you'll slowly use your human rights. One by one, until
you, your brothers and your sons will be sent to concentration
camps. It's already happening. It's called prisons and men are
sent there for every minor offense while women will rarely go
to jail!

Think about a radical feminist like Hillary Clinton as president.
Men will be the scapegoats for the lost wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq. Bush will be blamed, because he's a man. Unemployment
and declining economy will be blamed on men.

The next war won't be between different ideologies like communism
vs. fascism, it won't be a religious war Christians vs. Islam, no,
it will be men vs. women in the Western world and men will lose,
because they won't fight back.

So, men. Now you can still join the alpha men group and discuss
about building a new nation without feminism. With our joined
forces, we'll be able to buy land and build cities and infrastructure.
We'll be able to create some place for men of this world who
don't want to be enslaved, emasculated and destroyed.

Do you want to wait until you're taken to the concentration
camp to be killed? Do you really want your sons to die in the
male Holocaust?

No? Then please join us. With our joined forces, with our
money, with our talents we'll be able to turn some land into
a place where men will be men. And those women not
spoiled by feminism will be happy to live with us.

It's your choice! But you have to act now.

Alpha Man
w***@gmail.com
2007-09-23 13:06:31 UTC
Permalink
Men *are* at risk, and more of us need to be more proactive in
addressing and confronting the social trends that threaten our very
nature. I just don't believe the answer is found in scapegoating
feminism. For one thing, it's a vast over generalization. Feminism
comes in as many shades as personalities. A feminized education is
actually to our benefit. Know thy enemy and learn to speak their
language. Only then will women understand both our plight and our
power. Besides, if a man is so weak minded that he is in capable of
thinking for himself... well, do I really need to say it?

Unfortunately, as you say, many men just aren't listening. Outdated
notions of macho man-hood are being allowed to stand in our way and
providing more ammo for the sort of militant feminists you mention.
It's such that you can't even create a men's rights group without it
becoming saturated with pedophiles and misogynists spouting their own
one-sided and unsound cause. The cheats and the liars aren't helping
either. Too many men running off to the whores of Thailand with their
tails between their legs. It's enough to make nearly any militant
feminist think they're right.

BTW, Hillary will make a wonderful president. She certainly hasn't
managed to castrate Bill. She even remains married to him despite his
dawgish nature. I think you misjudge her true intent.

Peace.
Post by Alpha Man
X-No-Archive: yes
Oh dear, guys. I'm trying to invite you to the alpha men group
since 4 months and all I get is some trolls making fun of the
alpha men movement posting their homoerotic crap on here.
Yeah, great. You men have a problem. You don't see in what
dangerous times we're living. Some of you may see it, but most men
are just whining or making fun of men who're complaining about
feminism.
But don't you see the signs? In the Western world, men are either
seen as sexual predators or criminals. Most unemployed people
are men. The feminist school system is destroying our boys.
Look, where does this lead? Men will be considered as "obsolete"
and "expendable", "worthless".Buchenwald for men! Yeah, guys,
I'm talking about the Holocaust.
If you had told a German Jew in the 1920s that by 1945 he and his family
would most likely be dead and burned to ashes, he'd have laughed.
But the situation of men in 2007 is similar to Jews in the 1920s. Jews
were the scapegoats. Today, men are the scapegoats.
Do the math. Radical feminists are extreme lesbian bulldykes. They
don't want equality, but the destruction of all men. If you don't
act now, you'll slowly use your human rights. One by one, until
you, your brothers and your sons will be sent to concentration
camps. It's already happening. It's called prisons and men are
sent there for every minor offense while women will rarely go
to jail!
Think about a radical feminist like Hillary Clinton as president.
Men will be the scapegoats for the lost wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq. Bush will be blamed, because he's a man. Unemployment
and declining economy will be blamed on men.
The next war won't be between different ideologies like communism
vs. fascism, it won't be a religious war Christians vs. Islam, no,
it will be men vs. women in the Western world and men will lose,
because they won't fight back.
So, men. Now you can still join the alpha men group and discuss
about building a new nation without feminism. With our joined
forces, we'll be able to buy land and build cities and infrastructure.
We'll be able to create some place for men of this world who
don't want to be enslaved, emasculated and destroyed.
Do you want to wait until you're taken to the concentration
camp to be killed? Do you really want your sons to die in the
male Holocaust?
No? Then please join us. With our joined forces, with our
money, with our talents we'll be able to turn some land into
a place where men will be men. And those women not
spoiled by feminism will be happy to live with us.
It's your choice! But you have to act now.
Alpha Man
J. Keeper
2007-09-23 13:23:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alpha Man
Do you want to wait until you're taken to the concentration
camp to be killed? Do you really want your sons to die in the
male Holocaust?
Feminists started the war. Men will finish it.
AirRaid
2007-10-05 20:49:58 UTC
Permalink
Feminists are slimey, soul-sucking cunts from the depths of hell. they
must be exposed and crushed.
Post by w***@gmail.com
Men *are* at risk, and more of us need to be more proactive in
addressing and confronting the social trends that threaten our very
nature. I just don't believe the answer is found in scapegoating
feminism. For one thing, it's a vast over generalization. Feminism
comes in as many shades as personalities. A feminized education is
actually to our benefit. Know thy enemy and learn to speak their
language. Only then will women understand both our plight and our
power. Besides, if a man is so weak minded that he is in capable of
thinking for himself... well, do I really need to say it?
Unfortunately, as you say, many men just aren't listening. Outdated
notions of macho man-hood are being allowed to stand in our way and
providing more ammo for the sort of militant feminists you mention.
It's such that you can't even create a men's rights group without it
becoming saturated with pedophiles and misogynists spouting their own
one-sided and unsound cause. The cheats and the liars aren't helping
either. Too many men running off to the whores of Thailand with their
tails between their legs. It's enough to make nearly any militant
feminist think they're right.
BTW, Hillary will make a wonderful president. She certainly hasn't
managed to castrate Bill. She even remains married to him despite his
dawgish nature. I think you misjudge her true intent.
Peace.
Post by Alpha Man
X-No-Archive: yes
Oh dear, guys. I'm trying to invite you to the alpha men group
since 4 months and all I get is some trolls making fun of the
alpha men movement posting their homoerotic crap on here.
Yeah, great. You men have a problem. You don't see in what
dangerous times we're living. Some of you may see it, but most men
are just whining or making fun of men who're complaining about
feminism.
But don't you see the signs? In the Western world, men are either
seen as sexual predators or criminals. Most unemployed people
are men. The feminist school system is destroying our boys.
Look, where does this lead? Men will be considered as "obsolete"
and "expendable", "worthless".Buchenwald for men! Yeah, guys,
I'm talking about the Holocaust.
If you had told a German Jew in the 1920s that by 1945 he and his family
would most likely be dead and burned to ashes, he'd have laughed.
But the situation of men in 2007 is similar to Jews in the 1920s. Jews
were the scapegoats. Today, men are the scapegoats.
Do the math. Radical feminists are extreme lesbian bulldykes. They
don't want equality, but the destruction of all men. If you don't
act now, you'll slowly use your human rights. One by one, until
you, your brothers and your sons will be sent to concentration
camps. It's already happening. It's called prisons and men are
sent there for every minor offense while women will rarely go
to jail!
Think about a radical feminist like Hillary Clinton as president.
Men will be the scapegoats for the lost wars in Afghanistan
and Iraq. Bush will be blamed, because he's a man. Unemployment
and declining economy will be blamed on men.
The next war won't be between different ideologies like communism
vs. fascism, it won't be a religious war Christians vs. Islam, no,
it will be men vs. women in the Western world and men will lose,
because they won't fight back.
So, men. Now you can still join the alpha men group and discuss
about building a new nation without feminism. With our joined
forces, we'll be able to buy land and build cities and infrastructure.
We'll be able to create some place for men of this world who
don't want to be enslaved, emasculated and destroyed.
Do you want to wait until you're taken to the concentration
camp to be killed? Do you really want your sons to die in the
male Holocaust?
No? Then please join us. With our joined forces, with our
money, with our talents we'll be able to turn some land into
a place where men will be men. And those women not
spoiled by feminism will be happy to live with us.
It's your choice! But you have to act now.
Alpha Man
Topaz
2007-09-23 14:46:01 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 04:29:59 +0200, "Alpha Man"
Post by Alpha Man
X-No-Archive: yes
Oh dear, guys. I'm trying to invite you to the alpha men group
since 4 months and all I get is some trolls making fun of the
alpha men movement posting their homoerotic crap on here.
Yeah, great. You men have a problem. You don't see in what
dangerous times we're living. Some of you may see it, but most men
are just whining or making fun of men who're complaining about
feminism.
But don't you see the signs? In the Western world, men are either
seen as sexual predators or criminals. Most unemployed people
are men. The feminist school system is destroying our boys.
Look, where does this lead? Men will be considered as "obsolete"
and "expendable", "worthless".Buchenwald for men! Yeah, guys,
I'm talking about the Holocaust.
For one thing the holo is Jew propaganda brought to you by the same
feminists and other scum who control your media. For another thing the
National Socialists completely wiped out feminism in Germany. And for
another thing feminism is Jewish.

The Jewish controlled media is for women and minorities. The same
propaganda against men is also found in the propaganda against White
people in general. It's fine to be against the feminists but let's
face it how much balls does that take. That is why you are made fun
of. If you also defended the White race in general you would be
showing some real balls. The most dangerous areas are the Black areas.
You should proudly say you don't want to live there.

And of course the main enemy are the ones who control the media and
control everything else. These are the Jews.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Masculist
2007-09-23 16:56:12 UTC
Permalink
Oh jeeze, Alpha Man is acting like anti- feminist men could organize
and get money when in fact feminism serves the rich men who have the
money. Then we have in "Whysman" the equivalent of a holocaust denier
who says there is no powerful feminism and lastly we have a real
holocaust denier who says only the Nazi's can save us from feminism.

Let us all pray, "Dear God please save us from this scourge of
feminism?" Amen.

Smitty
Post by Topaz
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 04:29:59 +0200, "Alpha Man"
Post by Alpha Man
X-No-Archive: yes
Oh dear, guys. I'm trying to invite you to the alpha men group
since 4 months and all I get is some trolls making fun of the
alpha men movement posting their homoerotic crap on here.
Yeah, great. You men have a problem. You don't see in what
dangerous times we're living. Some of you may see it, but most men
are just whining or making fun of men who're complaining about
feminism.
But don't you see the signs? In the Western world, men are either
seen as sexual predators or criminals. Most unemployed people
are men. The feminist school system is destroying our boys.
Look, where does this lead? Men will be considered as "obsolete"
and "expendable", "worthless".Buchenwald for men! Yeah, guys,
I'm talking about the Holocaust.
For one thing the holo is Jew propaganda brought to you by the same
feminists and other scum who control your media. For another thing the
National Socialists completely wiped out feminism in Germany. And for
another thing feminism is Jewish.
The Jewish controlled media is for women and minorities. The same
propaganda against men is also found in the propaganda against White
people in general. It's fine to be against the feminists but let's
face it how much balls does that take. That is why you are made fun
of. If you also defended the White race in general you would be
showing some real balls. The most dangerous areas are the Black areas.
You should proudly say you don't want to live there.
And of course the main enemy are the ones who control the media and
control everything else. These are the Jews.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
w***@gmail.com
2007-09-24 05:10:59 UTC
Permalink
The extreamism of these google groups is extraordianary. In less than
a weeks time I've encountered a self-proclaimed pedophile who
rationalizes that adults are denying children valuable sexual
experiences, a mysoginist who claims society is on the verg of putting
all men in concentration camps for immediate destruction, a holocost
denier (enough said), and have already been branded an enemy for
attempting to present an actual balanced view. Do you all really
believe social recognition of your ideas will come from hidding away
in some obscure google group and spouting the most extream of all
possible spectrums??

BTW, I never stated there aren't social forces at work that are
putting men's very nature at risk. That is infact one of the first
things I said. There are militant feminist. Some of them are even
men. But one must be willing to choose their battles and recognize
the greatest enemy. For example, women who want equal pay for equal
work are not the real enemy. Nor do they seek the destruction of our
sex. They do however, call themselves feminists. Group them all
together and you create an insurmountable barrier of a perspective so
extream, few in society will try to examine its actually valid points.

Do as you will. No one is really listening. However, it could be
argued that some of you are going so far as to incite violence.
That's an argument that could be made in court. Carefull what you
wish for.

Oh, "whys" is a verb. Think about it. ;)
Post by Masculist
Oh jeeze, Alpha Man is acting like anti- feminist men could organize
and get money when in fact feminism serves the rich men who have the
money. Then we have in "Whysman" the equivalent of a holocaust denier
who says there is no powerful feminism and lastly we have a real
holocaust denier who says only the Nazi's can save us from feminism.
Let us all pray, "Dear God please save us from this scourge of
feminism?" Amen.
Smitty
Post by Topaz
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 04:29:59 +0200, "Alpha Man"
Post by Alpha Man
X-No-Archive: yes
Oh dear, guys. I'm trying to invite you to the alpha men group
since 4 months and all I get is some trolls making fun of the
alpha men movement posting their homoerotic crap on here.
Yeah, great. You men have a problem. You don't see in what
dangerous times we're living. Some of you may see it, but most men
are just whining or making fun of men who're complaining about
feminism.
But don't you see the signs? In the Western world, men are either
seen as sexual predators or criminals. Most unemployed people
are men. The feminist school system is destroying our boys.
Look, where does this lead? Men will be considered as "obsolete"
and "expendable", "worthless".Buchenwald for men! Yeah, guys,
I'm talking about the Holocaust.
For one thing the holo is Jew propaganda brought to you by the same
feminists and other scum who control your media. For another thing the
National Socialists completely wiped out feminism in Germany. And for
another thing feminism is Jewish.
The Jewish controlled media is for women and minorities. The same
propaganda against men is also found in the propaganda against White
people in general. It's fine to be against the feminists but let's
face it how much balls does that take. That is why you are made fun
of. If you also defended the White race in general you would be
showing some real balls. The most dangerous areas are the Black areas.
You should proudly say you don't want to live there.
And of course the main enemy are the ones who control the media and
control everything else. These are the Jews.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Topaz
2007-09-24 22:15:14 UTC
Permalink
http://vortxweb.net/gorgias/mens_issues/pay_gap.html

"The issue of unequal pay for equal work between men and women is
probably the issue that most women find easy to
rally behind that gender feminists have kept alive. While a
disparity stemming from discrimination may well have
existed up through the 1960's, in recent times this gap is
practically nonexistent. But the "(insert number here)
cents on the dollar" statistics are still frequently cited. Let's
see if this disparity can hold up under close (or
not so close) scrutiny.

If you don't want to bother reading on, here's a summary of this
material: When maternal leave, education, job
choice and experience are accounted for, there is no wage gap to be
found. When the often cited "75 cents on the
dollar" and similar numbers are calculated, they are typically a
ratio of the average wages of women divided by the
average wages of men. They do not focus on comparing wages in
specific work environments, and therefore the concept
of "equal pay for equal work" plays no part in creating these
numbers. None. None at all.

The fact of the matter is, it is next to impossible to compare
people of equal abilities and job roles, and so the
studies often cited rely heavily on data irrelevant to the question
of discrimination. Of course there are
male-dominated jobs (such as electrical engineering) that pay more
than female-dominated jobs (such as hairdresser
or secretary), but it is also true that it takes a lot more work
and education to be an engineer than to be an
office assistant. Women are now graduating from college in greater
numbers than men, but they're still not choosing
to go into fields that are abstractly challenging and pay the most.

There is also the fact that men simply work more hours than women
do, and most men don't take 'maternity leave',
giving them an earned advantage in getting promotions and raises.
Of course, a woman shouldn't be discriminated
against for the possibility of taking maternity leave, but the fact
is that many women choose to do so and are also
choosing to forfeit the financial gains they could have made had
they chosen not to have a child.

Sex roles have a lot to do with the pay gap, in more ways that you
might think. Despite all of the advances that
women have made in the workplace, society hasn't lessened the male
role to be a financial provider and breadwinner
for his family. Thus many men simply take jobs they like less (or
are more dangerous) because they pay more, due to
this social pressure. Women entered the workforce as an additional
choice they had (the other being to stay at
home), and in doing so they were more free to choose the less
demanding or dangerous jobs because they don't have
this traditional social pressure.

Also consider this: 24 of the 25 worst jobs rated according to the
Jobs Related Almanac are composed of over 95%
men. These are high-risk, hazardous jobs (often called the "death
professions"), which pay more than most
working-class jobs because they're so undesirable. But men will
work in them to be better providers for their
families.

If men didn't have this continual pressure to make money and
support their families, or if men didn't need money to
attract the attention of women, the average amount that men make
would certainly decrease. But instead we have a
social system that tells men to practically kill themselves to try
and make as much money as possible, and
feminists to complain as if men made this money on the basis of
discrimination. This is not what is really going
on. If anything, the fact that men make more than women on average
is because men basically don't have the choice
not to.

You want the stats? These articles speak for themselves, and if
they won't convince you, nothing will..."

[See web page]



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
r***@yahoo.com
2007-09-25 00:15:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by w***@gmail.com
The extreamism of these google groups is extraordianary. In less than
a weeks time I've encountered a self-proclaimed pedophile who
rationalizes that adults are denying children valuable sexual
experiences, a mysoginist who claims society is on the verg of putting
all men in concentration camps for immediate destruction, a holocost
denier (enough said), and have already been branded an enemy for
attempting to present an actual balanced view. Do you all really
believe social recognition of your ideas will come from hidding away
in some obscure google group and spouting the most extream of all
possible spectrums??
BTW, I never stated there aren't social forces at work that are
putting men's very nature at risk. That is infact one of the first
things I said. There are militant feminist. Some of them are even
men. But one must be willing to choose their battles and recognize
the greatest enemy. For example, women who want equal pay for equal
work are not the real enemy. Nor do they seek the destruction of our
sex. They do however, call themselves feminists. Group them all
together and you create an insurmountable barrier of a perspective so
extream, few in society will try to examine its actually valid points.
Do as you will. No one is really listening.
i'm listening -- have been for quite some time

you might try it for a couple decades, after which, if you're gutsy
and bright, you might have something worthwhile to contribute




However, it could be
Post by w***@gmail.com
argued that some of you are going so far as to incite violence.
That's an argument that could be made in court. Carefull what you
wish for.
Oh, "whys" is a verb. Think about it. ;)
Day Brown
2007-09-29 08:15:13 UTC
Permalink
Be that as it may, colleges are graduating more women, and more are
moving up the corporate ladder. Since women work for less than men,
they offer a lower cost of *management*; and since the cost of labor
is already trivial, that's the only way to increase *profits* for the
investors.

Feminism is a natural evolution of the capitalist global market, and
there's no way to put that genie back in the bottle. Get over it. Its
real simple. Might makes right. Always has, always will. Only now, the
brave heart, strong right arm, sword in hand, no longer cuts it. Smith
& Wesson guarantee equal rights for smart women, and all the rants
about it are pissing in the wind.

It is still the survival of the fittest. And the fittest now is not
the hero warrior, but the geek. Its the geek who created the software
and hardware you are using to post your rants. Hello?

Why is it that only the Nazi halocaust is denied? Why dont they deny
that the Japs killed twice as many, 12,000,000- or Stalin and Mao each
killed 50 million? Whats the big fuckin deal about a measly 6 million?
Topaz
2007-09-29 14:41:57 UTC
Permalink
By Rebecca Traister
When you turn on your television this fall, you'll be watching more
women kick more ass than you can possibly imagine-physically,
economically and sexually. Hard-bodied and smart, rich and aggressive,
confident and independent, the chicks who populate the prime-time
lineup are being cast in roles that once belonged almost exclusively
to men. These broads are cops and lawyers and masters of the business
universe. Hollywood doyennes like Kyra Sedgwick, Mary-Louise Parker
and Holly Hunter have already found midlife career solace (and good
writing) on cable. This year, Julianna Margulies will star as a nasty
Nancy Grace knockoff, Angie Harmon as a police lieutenant, Lucy Liu as
a publishing executive, and Patricia Heaton as a news anchor; there's
a new "Bionic Woman" and a whole show about the world's leading
incubator of the future, "The Terminator's" Sarah Connor. The flinty
Cagneys, Laceys, Murphys and Buffys of yore aren't the exceptions in
the new TV season; they rule. So what happened to the men? Nothing
good, that's for sure. Here, for instance, is what happens when Lucy
Liu's character, Mia, on ABC's "Cashmere Mafia," wins a work contest,
and big promotion, over her boyfriend and colleague Richard: He breaks
up with her, tail between his legs. "I thought I'd win and buy us a
place and take care of you," he explains. "And now that it's reversed
I just can't see us ... I'm 40 next month. I want someone to come home
to. I'm going to want kids, and we're just going in opposite
directions." Yup. Welcome to the new world on television, where the
women are strong, and the men are cavemen. Literally. ABC's "Cavemen,"
based on the Geico ad campaign character, is about a trio of
Cro-Magnons with low self-esteem and a little hair-growth problem.
Small-screen heroes who aren't actually dragging their knuckles behave
even worse. In the face of professional and sexual equality between
the televised sexes, these fictional guys are cowed, angry and
generally emasculated by the successes of their female counterparts.
It can't all be coincidence that this season is coming at the end of a
summer in which the biggest movie hits have featured dopey,
ill-groomed, irresponsible boys who score beautiful high-achieving
women and then have no idea what to do once they land them. That's
right, we're in Apatowland, baby, where the idea of a male romantic
lead now begins with a water bong and ends with a fart joke…
Among the degradations about to be heaped on television's men? There
are guys whose wives cheat on them, whose girlfriends get promoted
over them, whose mates make more money than they do; guys who get left
out of baby-making, who date women with penises and at least one who
gets anally raped by a monkey.
Seriously.
It's tough to know where to start in explaining how bad these boys
have it, but the monkey rape seems as good a place as any. It takes
place in the debut episode of the Farrelly brothers' half-hour comedy
"The Rules for Starting Over," which premieres on Fox in spring 2008,
about Gator (Craig Bierko), a menschy guy tossed back into the dating
market after his wife leaves him for a Cirque de Soleil performer.
Gator, who hasn't been on a date since his 20s, is mystified by women,
and startled to be invited up to the apartment of an attractive
naturalist who shows him tapes of the gorillas she's studied. She
informs him that "in the world of primates, the female always
initiates," pulling him onto the floor on top of her to demonstrate.
That's when the woman's pet baboon takes Gator from behind. Gator's
buddies do nickname the monkey "bi-curious George"-the only funny line
of the episode-but otherwise are a lamentable bunch. They include a
heavily accented Indian doctor, also recently divorced, and so lonely
and stupid that he invites an escort to his birthday dinner (at "Thank
God It Is Friday's"-think of how hilarious that is in an Indian
accent!) and proposes to her. As if getting ditched for a circus
acrobat isn't emblematic enough of the clownish powerlessness of
modern man, the show's lone female star is dating a short man who
works for the Celtics-as the team's bouncy mascot, Lucky the
Leprechaun!
At least the guys on "The Secrets of Starting Over" have met women.
Geeky schlubs Sheldon and Leonard (Jim Parsons and Johnny Galecki) on
CBS' "Big Bang Theory" are socially hobbled physicists whose only
sexual activity involves donating to a high-IQ sperm bank, so that
woman can get pregnant by them without actually having to touch them!
The guys meet a cute neighbor and by the end of the half-hour have had
their pants removed by her brawny ex. "It wasn't my first pantsing,
and it won't be my last," says a defeated Sheldon. Going pantsless is
one of the weirdly repeated themes of the new season, turning up again
in ABC's bone-chillingly bad comedy "Carpoolers."
The idea behind "Carpoolers," voiced several times during its pilot,
is that daily trips to and from work are the only escape for these
four miserable men, who have nothing in common except a barely
disguised antipathy for the women in their lives. Aubrey's wife has
him by the balls: He waits on her, cooks and cares for the kids while
she watches television and takes his money. Laird (Jerry O'Connell),
the carpool's founder, has been dumped by his wife, who cheated and
left him with nothing but an ass-print on the sliding glass door.
Gracen (Fred Goss) is married to Leila (Faith Ford), a woman he seems
to care for, but whose real estate "hobby" has recently become
lucrative. The pilot revolves around the carpool's suspicion that
Leila is making more money than her husband. The decline of
masculinity is further embodied by Gracen and Leila's subliterate
adult son Marmaduke, who inexplicably prances around the house without
trousers and miraculously lands a job at which he, too, will be making
more money than his father.
The fury and confusion about shifting gender roles as expressed on
"Carpoolers" is scary in its nakedness. At one point, Laird suggests
to Gracen that he talk to his wife about how she's spending his money.
"My money? Ha ha, no," says Gracen. "All the money I make is our
money; it always has been. The money she's making now is her money."
Aubrey chimes in, "Well at least you have your money. My wife gets my
checks; I don't even know how much I make!" To which Laird says, "My
wife and I have it all worked out out. She gets everything. Her lawyer
saw to that."
Ha ha ha ha!
Later Laird stokes Gracen's fear by explaining that "men go off to
war; women shop; if we don't provide for our women, do they really
need us?" Part of the horror of this show is how it-and not the
specter of the high-earning wife-is actually stripping its heroes of
anything resembling self-respect or masculine dignity. Gracen squirms
around about Leila's income like a spineless nelly; he curls in a
fetal position when he hears how much she has in her account; he can
only have sex with her after he realizes it's all been a
misunderstanding-of course she's not wealthier than he is!
"Carpoolers" does more to impugn the American male than any
high-earning spouse could ever do. But if this sitcom is any
measure-and god willing it is not-the American female is fucked. There
is no mode of femininity that satisfies these guys: The wife who is
too successful makes her husband feel unmanly; the wife who doesn't
work makes her husband bake; the wife who leaves is a bitch who takes
the furniture…
At least the barely sublimated aggression is played for laughs in the
sitcoms. When it comes to the dramas, the female triumphs are that
much more potent, and the resulting arrested machismo of the men is
that much more ... not potent. On ABC's "Women's Murder Club," Angie
Harmon is police Lt. Lindsay Boxer-recently promoted over her older
male colleague-who solves murders with the support of her best female
confidants, a reporter, a medical examiner and a D.A. (brunet, blond,
African-American, natch). They're such a successful clique that they
even have a wannabe (Asian!) member, who begs to become a part of
their club, which she sees as "women teaming up to level the playing
field in a man's world."
The only area in which these women show any weakness is their love
lives, but it's made clear that that has a lot to do with male
discomfort with their power. As Lindsay says about her failed
marriage, "Before he left, I kept promising that I would change. That
I would put him over the job and that I would be at home more.
Eventually he just stopped believing me, and he was right." But even
without the husband, she shows no interest in changing. When it's
pointed out that Lindsay hasn't had sex in two years, she says
defensively, "I'm picky. And busy." Medical examiner Claire (Paula
Newsome) has a more successful relationship. When she goes home to
cuddle with her husband, we understand him to be a man comfortable
with his wife's power as soon as she sits in his lap ... in his
wheelchair.
Set on an opposite coast and a professional world apart, ABC's
"Cashmere Mafia" strikes amazingly similar notes to "Women's Murder
Club." "Mafia" is Darren Starr's attempt to plunder the "Sex and the
City" audience, before the mid-season debut of NBC's "Lipstick
Jungle," based on a book by the original Carrie, Candace Bushnell.
"Mafia" begins with a shot of New York amazons (brunet, blond,
red-headed, Asian!) striding down a Gotham street. "This is a story
about four friends who were taught from childhood that through hard
work and smart choices they could have it all," the efficient
voice-over tells us. Zoe (Frances O'Connor) is a Wall Street macher
with a great family and stay-at-home- dad husband so devoted that he
turns down a play-group mom's offer for strings-free sex. Juliet
(Miranda Otto) is a hotel chain executive; Caitlin (Bonnie Somerville)
is a marketing executive for a cosmetics company who, according to the
intro, "says she lives for work because work never tells her that he's
just not that into her." But her imperviousness to men may not be
simply attitudinal; she's also a budding lesbian. After her first kiss
with a woman, the pilot's soundtrack plays "You Make Me Feel Like a
Natural Woman." That's right, boys. Want to know what makes this
beautiful woman feel like a woman? A woman! Suck it! Like the Murder
Club ladies, these women are utterly self-sufficient professionally,
except insomuch as they rely on each other for detailed
four-way-phone- call advice…
On "Big Shots," "Cashmere Mafia's" corollary about a bunch of
classically red-blooded businessmen, the four friends sit around a
swimming pool taking a schvitz like the girls on "Sisters" used to do.
"Look at us," says Brody, played by Christopher Titus, as a man so
devoted to his wife that he spends the whole episode micromanaging the
catering for her birthday party, "We're supposed to be these alpha
males, right? But now James' wife is sleeping around on him and Karl
can't control his crazy mistress and I'm so whipped that I can't tell
my wife that the delivery company can't seem to find her shipment of
Napoleans." Duncan (Dylan McDermott) replies flatly, "Men, we're the
new women," just before Brody gets a phone call that he answers, "Oh,
what fresh hell ... What do you mean the pastry filling won't clear
customs?"
"Big Shots" is one of the two-two! -- new dramas so befuddled by
gender arrangements that in their pilots, they have their muscular
male leads-McDermott on "Big Shots" and William Baldwin on ABC's
"Dirty Sexy Money"-engaging in sex with transvestites. What better
symbol could there be of the emasculation of television's men and the
chicks-with- dicks attitude toward its women? As "Dirty Sexy Money"
lead Peter Krause taunts Baldwin's character: "Is she more of a man
than you are?"
Yes. She is more of a man than he is. All of television's women are,
apparently. You know you're in trouble when Julianna Margulies' tough
lawyer character on Fox's "Canterbury's Law," which premieres
midseason, walks in on her male junior colleague in the pisser, and
when he asks her to leave, she merely turns on the water to hurry
things along.
Rather than seeing their opportunities for interaction with women
expand, these men have instead curled into fetal positions like Gracen
on "Carpoolers." Is it simply impossible for the televised heroes of
yesteryear to go gracefully into their new world order? It's
understandable and honest to express some befuddlement with shifting
expectations. But these are characters whose discomfort makes them
unattractive, or silly-looking. They are whipped, flummoxed and
helpless without the power to make the calls-in the bedroom or the
boardroom. They can't just be normal nice guys who are no longer
entirely in control, who do childcare or play a subordinate role at
work but who do so in a way that is still sexy, still powerful,
instead of in a way that is marked as submissive, beaten down or
pansy-assed. Nope, they must be buffoons, caricatures, dopes or just
angry, neutered bastards.
It's discomfiting for women, too, to see television's idea of what a
feminized man is, since it is a reflection of what television
considers feminine to begin with. If these men are "the new women,"
then what does that say about what they take women for? Do they think
we have hissy fits when we discover how much our husbands have in
their bank accounts? That we flip out when a man comes on to us? That
when we get passed over for promotions we walk out of relationships in
defeat? If these are supposed to be girly-men, then the notion of what
girly looks like is simply ghastly, an insult not only to the men, but
to the women whose habits they are supposedly aping. Little wonder
that many of these programs include plotlines in which women and men
turn in on their own gender to fulfill their social, professional and
sexual needs.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Alpha Man
2007-09-30 03:52:18 UTC
Permalink
X-No-Archive: yes

That's a reason to avoid TV, it does turn men into
pussies or homosexuals and this is goin on since
the 1980s.

What we need are REAL MEN on TV, the heroes,
the warriors, the brave knights. But feminism does
deny us positive male role-models in favor of
portraying men as evil, as sissyboys or as homosexuals.

That's what our sons learn "Being gay is the right way."

I refuse to watch shows where men are degraded to
sissyboy and homosexual level, any real man should
avoid these.

It's like these stupid trolls who keep trolling the alpha men
group with their homosexual crap. They certainly are
kids who've watched too many of these anti-male shows.

Better join the alpha men group and contribute with good
ideas to build a new alpha men society and please switch
off the TV.

Alpha Man
Day Brown
2007-10-02 13:05:02 UTC
Permalink
Well Thanx Topaz. I dont watch much TV, but what I've read of
Rebecca's rant seems consistent. TV is like walking into the mental
ward; it dont take long to figure out how everyone thinks; if that's
what you call it. And TV is like the voices of a schizoid, which tells
you more about how he thinks.

But no, its too late to act. If there were still time, you would have
had the mental capacity to organize and post the rant yourself instead
of letting a woman do it for you. I have, in fact, posted some on this
iconic issue trying to sort out where it is headed. Stopping it is not
an option.

The Samuri had the right idea, to ban the use of fire arms, and
actually succeeded for a couple hundred years while their sword
technology continued to advance. But Topaz, you, and all the rest of
the warrior classes lacked the integrity to do that. You permitted
chickenshit bastards, (who did not dare to stand toe to toe and murder
looking an enemy in the eye) to enter your ranks and stand behind
barricades pulling triggers to murder at a distance. Even a woman can
do that, and now, my friend, they have figured that out, and your
whole trip is fucked.

And worse, because you wanted slaves and followers to feed your ego,
you *bred* more cowards. But now, the cowards like pussy more than
power, and so it is you, and your cadres of noble men who are not
getting fucked. And as for a noble death, no forget that. They will
put you on meds and send you home to your momma.

The history is obscure, but many of the independent city states of the
Silk Road were run by women, and had been for millennia. A lotta guys
became monks. Many of them look like faggots, and were prolly happy
at the monestary. There were, however, always rich merchants coming
thru and there were always plenty of call girls and brothels. Then as
now, if you didnt like the way women ran things, you could always move
to a place where men did. Like Yemen.
Topaz
2007-10-02 22:21:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Day Brown
Well Thanx Topaz. I dont watch much TV, but what I've read of
Rebecca's rant seems consistent. TV is like walking into the mental
ward; it dont take long to figure out how everyone thinks; if that's
what you call it. And TV is like the voices of a schizoid, which tells
you more about how he thinks.
But no, its too late to act. If there were still time, you would have
had the mental capacity to organize and post the rant yourself instead
of letting a woman do it for you. I have, in fact, posted some on this
iconic issue trying to sort out where it is headed. Stopping it is not
an option.
The Samuri had the right idea, to ban the use of fire arms, and
actually succeeded for a couple hundred years while their sword
technology continued to advance. But Topaz, you, and all the rest of
the warrior classes lacked the integrity to do that. You permitted
chickenshit bastards, (who did not dare to stand toe to toe and murder
looking an enemy in the eye) to enter your ranks and stand behind
barricades pulling triggers to murder at a distance. Even a woman can
do that, and now, my friend, they have figured that out, and your
whole trip is fucked.
And worse, because you wanted slaves and followers to feed your ego,
you *bred* more cowards. But now, the cowards like pussy more than
power, and so it is you, and your cadres of noble men who are not
getting fucked. And as for a noble death, no forget that. They will
put you on meds and send you home to your momma.
The history is obscure, but many of the independent city states of the
Silk Road were run by women, and had been for millennia. A lotta guys
became monks. Many of them look like faggots, and were prolly happy
at the monestary. There were, however, always rich merchants coming
thru and there were always plenty of call girls and brothels. Then as
now, if you didnt like the way women ran things, you could always move
to a place where men did. Like Yemen.
Thank you for showing how evil many lesbians are.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Day Brown
2007-10-03 18:02:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Thank you for showing how evil many lesbians are.
Its not my job to make moral judgments. I find it worth my while to
see what is coming down, try to understand why, and get out of the way
of that power whether I like it or not. In the case of Lesbians, some
are definatly dangerous bitches guys like you should watch out for.

But others are simply young women who were so abused by a man that
they are too afraid to ever get involved with any men again. Had they
common sense and decent judgment, they would have seen how dangerous
some stud muffins are, but since they are not all that smart, at least
being with a dyke means they wont be producing bastards to be raised
by your taxes.

I think we both agree there are too many stupid bitches the way it is,
and the last thing we want is them breeding. Dykes tend to solve that
problem for us.

There's also the question of how long the good is good for, or how
long the evil bad for. Who better to whip the lard ass Americans back
into shape than a buncha evil dykes taking over the power structure?
Only the strongest men will survive. You got a problem with that?
Topaz
2007-10-04 21:55:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Day Brown
Its not my job to make moral judgments. I find it worth my while to
see what is coming down, try to understand why, and get out of the way
of that power whether I like it or not. In the case of Lesbians, some
are definatly dangerous bitches guys like you should watch out for.
But others are simply young women who were so abused by a man that
they are too afraid to ever get involved with any men again. Had they
common sense and decent judgment, they would have seen how dangerous
some stud muffins are, but since they are not all that smart, at least
being with a dyke means they wont be producing bastards to be raised
by your taxes.
I think we both agree there are too many stupid bitches the way it is,
and the last thing we want is them breeding. Dykes tend to solve that
problem for us.
There's also the question of how long the good is good for, or how
long the evil bad for. Who better to whip the lard ass Americans back
into shape than a buncha evil dykes taking over the power structure?
Only the strongest men will survive. You got a problem with that?
I have a big problem with evil dykes taking over the power
structure. It would be nice if the lard ass Americans were whipped
back into shape though.

The main thing I have a problem with is the Jews controlling the
media. They have their boy Rush telling guys to fight the "feminazis"
by kissing the Jewish aft ends of the ones really behind the trouble.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Day Brown
2007-10-05 09:31:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
The main thing I have a problem with is the Jews controlling the
media. They have their boy Rush telling guys to fight the "feminazis"
by kissing the Jewish aft ends of the ones really behind the trouble.
If you wanna destroy Jewish control of the media, get behind the
exposure of the 911 conspiracy. You any idea how much Silverstein made
on his insurance for the WTC? The general stock price decline prolly
made Wall Street Jews a Trillion.

There's also a report from Zurich of suspicious put calls on 20 stocks
like American Airlines that dropped dramatically right after 9/11/01.
for sure Mossad knew what was coming down, and I'd not be surprised if
they planned 911 to get Bush to attack Saddam. Who- if you recall, had
sent missiles to Israel.

Course, this'll prolly implicate Bush, Cheney, & Rumsfeld. But if you
are going to stop Hillary, you need a candidate who will blow 911 wide
open, and thereby discredit the Jewish media which is already
promoting her to take over in 08.
Topaz
2007-10-05 23:27:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Day Brown
If you wanna destroy Jewish control of the media, get behind the
exposure of the 911 conspiracy. You any idea how much Silverstein made
on his insurance for the WTC? The general stock price decline prolly
made Wall Street Jews a Trillion.
There's also a report from Zurich of suspicious put calls on 20 stocks
like American Airlines that dropped dramatically right after 9/11/01.
for sure Mossad knew what was coming down, and I'd not be surprised if
they planned 911 to get Bush to attack Saddam. Who- if you recall, had
sent missiles to Israel.
Course, this'll prolly implicate Bush, Cheney, & Rumsfeld. But if you
are going to stop Hillary, you need a candidate who will blow 911 wide
open, and thereby discredit the Jewish media which is already
promoting her to take over in 08.
Good point. Here is what David Duke wrote about it:

New evidence shows that Israel knew in advance about the planned 9-11
terror attack and treacherously did not warn America.

New Orleans, Louisiana, December 12, 2001 . In response to the
following information, European-American Unity and Rights Organization
(EURO) National President, David Duke, is calling for the Indictment
of Ariel Sharon as an accessory to terrorism and murder, and an
immediate halt to American monetary and military support of Israel.

Fox News just broke the story (Dec. 12) that the FBI has arrested 60
Israelis for spying on the United States and that Terrorism Task Force
investigators have found evidence linking them to the September 11
attacks on the United States. They report that evidence exists
indicating that high-level Israeli operatives (and thus Israel's
Government) had advance knowledge of the September 11 attack and
treacherously failed to inform the
American Government, thus permitting the mass death and destruction of
September 11.

Here is the quote from Fox News, Dec. 12, 2001
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,40679,00.html

<Begin Quote>

"WASHINGTON - Some 60 Israelis, who federal investigators have said
are part of a long-running effort to spy on American government
officials, are among the hundreds of foreigners detained since the
Sept. 11 terror attacks, Fox News has learned.

The Israelis, a handful of whom are described as active Israeli
military or intelligence operatives, have been detained on immigration
charges or under the new Patriot Anti-Terrorism Law. Federal
investigators said some of them failed polygraph questions inquiring
about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United
States.

There is no indication the Israelis were involved in the Sept. 11
attacks, but investigators suspect that they may have gathered
intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it.

A highly placed investigator told Fox News there are "tie-ins," but
when asked for details flatly refused to describe them. "Evidence
linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified, I cannot tell you about
evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information," the
source said...."

<End Quote>

As I have said in my recent article entitled "How Israeli Terrorism
and American Treason Caused the September Attacks!", there is already
powerful evidence that the Israeli Government knew about the attacks
in advance and purposefully did not inform American officials. The
reason is that they wanted this horrendous "Arab" act of terrorism
against America to happen so as to help Israel in their current
struggle with the Palestinians.

The New York Times confirmed that the 130 Israeli casualties claimed
by President Bush were false. Incredibly only one Israeli actually
died in the WTC, a figure that is so fantastically low it proves that
some Israelis were warned in advance. The Washington Post's Newsbytes
also confirmed that Israeli employees in the WTC, through Odigo
instant messages, got prior warnings two hours before the attacks!

The fact that Israel knew about this attack in advance and warned
Israeli nationals, but not the American people, has to be one of the
most treacherous acts in the history of America. The fact that Israel
purposely allowed the attack to go on makes Israel complicit in the
deaths of 4000 Americans.

We are calling on President Bush work with world leaders to issue an
international condemnation of Israel for and immediately cut off all
United States monetary and military aid to Israel. In addition, we are
calling on President Bush to charge Ariel Sharon and the leaders of
the Israeli Mossad, as accessories to terrorism and murder.

For more information including complete sources and citations go to
Rep. David Duke at www.davidduke.co


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Day Brown
2007-10-06 14:33:02 UTC
Permalink
If you want to persuade the open minded, I would not cite David Duke
or any of the Nazis, or any other 'anti-Semites'. You need testimony
from what are regarded as non-partisan sources.

Take, for instance, this photo: Loading Image...
I have a welding torch, have done a little welding, worked with a
lotta hot metal, and I know you can not get that color orange, much
less yellow, in steel burning Jet fuel, or even acetylene without
supplying oxygen to the point of combustion.

Its real simple. Something was in the Twin Towers that should not have
been there. There are photos of the towers that look like explosives
blowing the windows out. Well, if thermate & explosives were used,
then tiny droplets of molten steel would have been shot out, to harden
in the air, and land like shotgun pellets all over the area. They will
still be there in sheltered niches, cracks in the sidewalk or
windowsills of the facing buildings. All you need is a magnet, a
dental pick, and a magnifying glass. Some of the pellets will be less
than a millimeter.

There is other such *physical* evidence to be presented. You dont
start with accusations against Jews or anyone else, which will only be
denied. Then, the next step is to familiarize yourself with the lie
detection techniques discovered by Dr. Paul Ekman (http://
www.paulekman.com) and use a high speed, high def camera during
testimony. with that, you can get the truth from witnesses, whether
they want to comply or not.

Why doesnt the CIA use this in Iraq & Afghanistan? because they know
that soon enuf, these techniques will be used on *them*. There was
collusion between some members of the CIA and Mossad to setup 911.
Orders were given to American forces that Mossand could not have
done.

Bear in mind, that as more people retire, they no longer fear the
effect on their careers, and increasing numbers of them are coming
forth to post what they believe to be the truth. Again, Ekman's
techniques can be used to support their veracity. As Bush becomes an
increasingly lame duck, more people will be coming forth and posting.
You will make a lotta progress posting the links to what they have to
say, but if you mention any anti-semetic links or persons, then
whatever you have to say will be dismissed, and not followed up on.

Lastly, lets be clear here. The Moslems are not our friends. They have
violent confrontations with each other, and with all the non-moslem
cultures around them. 911 was a false flag event to justify the
attempted take over of Iraqi oil. There is a lot to be said for that
from a Realpolitik point of view. There is a good case to be made that
this is necessary, but that case was never made. Strategically, Israel
is a useful tool- that could, for instance, be used to bomb Iran's
nuclear facilities like it already has done. And even tho it was all
done with US weapons, the US could claim innocence. Read Machiavelli.
Topaz
2007-10-07 14:25:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Day Brown
Lastly, lets be clear here. The Moslems are not our friends.
Wrong. They are not your freinds because you are a feminist.
Post by Day Brown
They have
violent confrontations with each other, and with all the non-moslem
cultures around them.
RENSE.COM

"The most ironic part of it all is that we Jews taught the
world that the Moslems are evil. This is a totally false
concept. I visited many Moslem countries and they are a most
gentle people...primarily because of their religion. Moslems
are praying 5 times a day, they do not have time to play
Pokemon, go on drive-by shootings, or watch another Jewish
TV 'documentary'.......My husband always said that as long as
we Jews control your TV, you American dummies will believe
anything!"

<http://www.rense.com/general30/balias.htm>
Post by Day Brown
911 was a false flag event to justify the
attempted take over of Iraqi oil. There is a lot to be said for that
from a Realpolitik point of view.
Israel Lobby Denial: The Bankruptcy of the Mainstream Left
Stephen J. Sniegoski
http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_lo bby_left.htm
The antiwar Left would prefer that old-style American imperialism and
the quest for oil had caused the Iraq War. They are the preferred
enemies of the Left. They are the traditional villains. And they are
safe villains. Mentioning Israel as a culprit would cause problems: it
would lose support for the Left among activist Jews, and it would lead
to hostility from the Israel lobby and mainstream Jewish groups. By
way of contrast, no one ever got in trouble berating oil magnates or
Arab sheiks ... Also important is the fact that Jews, categorically,
are considered to be victims; and it is hard for the Left to criticize
an officially recognized victimized group. In terms of left- wing
psychology the ideal is to strike a radical, nonconformist pose
without really alienating the powerful ...
Post by Day Brown
There is a good case to be made that
this is necessary, but that case was never made. Strategically, Israel
is a useful tool- that could, for instance, be used to bomb Iran's
nuclear facilities like it already has done. And even tho it was all
done with US weapons, the US could claim innocence. Read Machiavelli.
"Jews always position themselves as mediators. These
nasties hold it cardinal they accredit and interpret *everything*.
Nothing has worth or meaning until it's pronounced upon by a generous
scoop of shit in a hate hat. Nothing must be expressed save in jewish
terms. Invaders become undocumented workers. Queers become gays.
Freakins become African-Americans. Attack on Iraq becomes defense of
America. Nothing is legitimate save Big Kike stamp off on it.

BK doesn't like it when a Sheehan steps forward and foghorns facts to
fodder. Instantly, like mosquitoes at twilight, a flock of
bloodthirsty kikes appears, buzzing and sucking and whining. Have you
ever noticed that it is impossible to criticize jews and keep your
character? The jews have literally billions of enemies worldwide, yet
not a single one of them is an honest man of laudable motive. It is
impossible to carry off this charade without controlling the media
and a hell of a lot of other things too. The minute jew-criticism
appears, the ashkenazis and appeaser annies begin the smear. No one
ever opposed a loving kike except invidiously. Smear campaigns are
media control in action. There are other aspects of media control, but
day in day out, making horrible shrieks and gurgles to keep the goyish
herd away from the healthy green fields is the workaday business of
the controllers. Jews determine which issues may be debated, and in
what terms. Jews make up more than fifty percent of the experts on
both sides of these tiny debates. A few vetted goyim are allowed
through to keep up the charade of democratic discussion. The Internet
is the only medium that prevents the illusion of popular conformity
with jewthink being carried off. All that is necessary for jews to
maintain control is to create a congenial if bogus reality through
television and the main dailies, and relentlessly enforce this
orthodoxy through smear campaigns against any who breach it.

The death of a son is one of the few motives strong enough to drive
average goy fodder to breach etiquette and speak truth to kikes. She
must be shut down. How to do that? You can see the jews' uncertainty.
They attack her, at the same time, as both a lefty and a nazi.
Illogical, but in time they'll settle on an approach. Sometimes just
throwing shit and see what sticks is the best way. How dare Sheehan
value her own son more than the interests of Israel?

I say my son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew he
was LYING.

And none of the thick rancid honkings Limbaugh and the freeper
patriotards can gainsay it. Remember that bushy came out of manly
Barbara, the wizened maw who asked why she should trouble her
"beautiful mind" about the body bags coming back from Iraq. You know -
the ones you never see, because they have to show you endless pictures
of $440,000-compensated jews being "ethnically cleansed," sniff, yet
again. Only an anti-Semite puts his own life before Israel. The jews
are the one people on earth who routinely are absolved of guilt for
that for which they and they alone are guilty. Isn't that odd?

DaX

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Day Brown
2007-10-08 03:39:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Post by Day Brown
Lastly, lets be clear here. The Moslems are not our friends.
Wrong. They are not your freinds because you are a feminist.
Can you list the Non-Moslem cultures which think they are the friends
of the Moslems?
Shall we do the circuit starting from Israel? The Lebanese Christians?
Then going north along the edge of the Moslem world we have the Island
of Cyprus, where the Christians have had problems with the Moslems.
Then to the Serbs who have had problems with them. Then too the
Caucuses and the problems the Russians had. Then East to Western
China, where the Moslems have been robbing Tocharian graves and
desecrating priceless Buddhist art.

then south along the Pakistani border where they have been practicing
genocide against the Lakash in the Himalayas, and then into the Hindu
Kush, where zealots have driven out all the Hindus, and now they want
to hold elections. And over course, further west we get to Africa, and
Darfur. As well as the violence against Christians and African shamen
all the way to Nigeria. And all along the southern coast of Europe,
they dont want the rag heads.

So- who are the friends of the Moslems?

What I am does not matter. I have no power in any of this; I merely
point out what is coming down whether I like it or not, and cause you
dont like it, you think I am promoting it. I'm just the messenger.
Topaz
2007-10-08 14:42:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Day Brown
Can you list the Non-Moslem cultures which think they are the friends
of the Moslems?
Yes, Fascist Italy and National Socialist Germany. Other cultures are
controlled by the Jews.

General Leon Degrelle was the leader of the Belgian contingent of the
Waffen SS. He was in 75 hand-to-hand combat actions against the
Marxists. This is what he wrote:
"German racialism has been deliberately distorted. It never was
"anti-other race"... National Socialist racialism was not against the
other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and
improving its race and wished that all other races did the same for
themselves. It was demonstrated when the Waffen
SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS troops.
The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs and their
religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an iman; each company
had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their
highest expression... I was present when each of my Islamic comrades
received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a
pendant with a small Koran. He was honouring them with what was the
most important aspect of their lives and their history."
Post by Day Brown
Shall we do the circuit starting from Israel? The Lebanese Christians?
Then going north along the edge of the Moslem world we have the Island
of Cyprus, where the Christians have had problems with the Moslems.
Then to the Serbs who have had problems with them. Then too the
Caucuses and the problems the Russians had. Then East to Western
China, where the Moslems have been robbing Tocharian graves and
desecrating priceless Buddhist art.
then south along the Pakistani border where they have been practicing
genocide against the Lakash in the Himalayas, and then into the Hindu
Kush, where zealots have driven out all the Hindus, and now they want
to hold elections. And over course, further west we get to Africa, and
Darfur. As well as the violence against Christians and African shamen
all the way to Nigeria. And all along the southern coast of Europe,
they dont want the rag heads.
The media says all kinds of bad things about Whites too. That is
because the media is controlled by Jews. You want to believe the media
because you are a feminists and the Moslems are anti-feminist.
Post by Day Brown
So- who are the friends of the Moslems?
What I am does not matter. I have no power in any of this; I merely
point out what is coming down whether I like it or not, and cause you
dont like it, you think I am promoting it. I'm just the messenger.
You may be right on what is coming down. That is why we should side
with those who want to destroy the USA government (the Jews).

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Day Brown
2007-10-08 18:03:43 UTC
Permalink
The history is obscure, but you can find out that a Sogdian king
invited various clerics of all the religions he knew of to come and
present their case. He selected the Torah as the one valid spiritual
document. The result is the Ashkenazic Jews, who are not, and never
were, semetic, but *Aryan*.

And when Sogdia was over run by the Moslems, they fled to Europe. You
dont find this out in the media. And there is much else that you can
discover about the history of Islam that has nothing whatever to do
with the admitted fact that the Ashkenazic Jews run American media.
You can access links posted by the Chinese & Indians outlining the
problems they have had with the Moslems, and their history books show
it has gone on for centuries.

Likewise, Africans suffered under the slave trade by Moslems long
after the western nations gave it up. Agreed that the Jews are liars,
but that does not mean that everything they say is a lie. They need to
express some truth to retain their credibility.

http://www.silk-road.com/newsletter/vol3num2/5_bloom.php is one of the
sources to start with. Aryans began spreading out of Europe with the
domestication of the horse 6000 years ago, and appear in what is now
NW China 4000 years ago. Ever since then, the Aryan ancestors of the
Sogdians ran trade between China and Europe on what came to be known
as the Silk Road.

What we think of as the "Jews" were the merchant class, who collected
scriptures from many religions and translated them between 20
different languages including Sogdian, Tocharian, Chinese, Persian, &
Sanskrit. The ancestors of the Jews in control of the American media
were the Magi. They have been making money out of religion and
business for millennia, and they are damn good at it. The deserts of
Central Asia preserved many lost documents. The website above mentions
a mail bag that was found in the Kara Kum, which was lost in 331 AD.
With letters written on *paper*, which we didnt even know had been
invented yet. Many of which were in a feminine hand.

Many of the "Jews" now, and then, are nothing but front men. Its not
the Jews who are taking over, its the *Jewesses*. They are the
femonazis guys worry about. But they wont have you shot. If you make
enuf trouble, they'll put you on meds and send you home to your momma.
However, if they find you useful, then you'll get more pussy than you
ever imagined.
Topaz
2007-10-09 22:54:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Day Brown
The history is obscure, but you can find out that a Sogdian king
invited various clerics of all the religions he knew of to come and
present their case. He selected the Torah as the one valid spiritual
document. The result is the Ashkenazic Jews, who are not, and never
were, semetic, but *Aryan*.
And when Sogdia was over run by the Moslems, they fled to Europe. You
dont find this out in the media. And there is much else that you can
discover about the history of Islam that has nothing whatever to do
with the admitted fact that the Ashkenazic Jews run American media.
You can access links posted by the Chinese & Indians outlining the
problems they have had with the Moslems, and their history books show
it has gone on for centuries.
http://www.solarcross.com/behindcom.htm
Expelled
The Fourth Lateran Council restricted Jewish commercial advantage but
it did not end the Jewish problem. Beginning in the latter part of the
13th century, one European country after another expelled its Jewish
population as the only final solution to the problem. First to take
the step was England which banned them in 1290. Fifteen years later in
1306 the French followed suit. In steady succession the various states
of Europe emulated this example with Spain being one of the last to
enforce the ban in 1492. The situation in Spain is worth noting. Says
Encyclopedia Britannica: [page 57, vol. 13 - 1947]: "... The 14th
century was the golden age of their history in Spain. In 1391 the
preaching of a priest of Seville, Fernando Martinez, led to the first
general massacre of the Jews who were envied for their prosperity and
hated because they were the king's tax collectors." Ferdinand and
Isabella, after uniting Spain and driving out the Moors turned their
attention to the Jewish problem, with the result that they were
evicted completely in 1492. In 1498 Portugal evicted its Jewish
population also.

The Exploiters
A great deal has been said about the "persecution" of the Jews in
Europe and elsewhere, and they have pretty well convinced the world
(or at least Americans) that these hardships were inflicted on an
innocent people. But these rich Spanish Jews we see being evicted in
1492 were not down-trodden folk. They were the wealthy, the
privileged, the exploiters: they were the well-fed merchants and the
gouging tax collectors ...

So it was in Portugal; in that country we find that the deportation of
the Jews ... "deprived Portugal of its middle class and its most
scientific traders and financiers." [Encyclopedia Britannica, page
279, vol. 18 - 1947.] Undeniably this class of traders and financiers
was put to hardship by this banishment, but it does not follow that
they were victims of discrimination in the accepted sense, nor were
they underprivileged in any way. Rather we see a wealthy merchant
group being ousted from its seat of vested privilege by a thoroughly
outraged, and a thoroughly exploited Christian society ...

The situation in England was similar. The Jews had come to England in
the wake of the Norman conquest and had quickly gained a position of
wealth and prosperity. Says Valentine's Jewish Encyclopedia of this
period: "Their numbers and prosperity increased, Aaron of Lincoln
being the wealthiest man in England in his time ... his financial
transactions covering the whole country and concerning many of the
leading nobles and churchmen ... On his death his property passed to
the crown and a special branch of the exchequer had to be created to
deal with it."

England
England, ironically enough, was the last country to be invaded by the
Jews and the first to evict them. After the Fourth Lateran Council the
Jews had become increasingly difficult to deal with and there were a
number of anti-Jewish riots. Perplexed by the problem posed by this
alien minority which seemed well on its way to corralling the
kingdom's wealth, and failing in an attempt to force its assimilation.
Edward I confiscated all Jewish wealth and evicted them permanently in
1290. Not until 1655 was a Jew legally permitted to re-enter England.
Britain thus established the precedent for the later eviction which
soon followed on the continent.

France
In France too the Jews were dominant in trade and finance and had been
since before Charlemagne's time. Under Philip the Fair (1285-1314) one
of the last, and certainly one of the greatest of the Capetian line,
France had become the greatest power in Europe. It was Philip's need
for money which led him to seize Jewish wealth and drive them from the
country. He had already before 1306 taken desperate measures to raise
money, which was in short supply, by forbidding the export of gold and
silver from France. The same need for money brought him into conflict
with the Templars, whose wealth he also seized. But it was the Jews
who controlled the greatest supply of floating wealth. In 1306 Philip
solved his financial problem-and France's Jewish problem-by
expropriating their wealth and evicting them. Thus ended the
centuries-long commercial dominance of the Jew in France. Later a few
were permitted to return and these were in turn ejected in 1394.

RETURN TO THE EAST
The Evictions
Space does not permit a detailed discussion of the other evictions
which followed and which resulted in the banishment of the Jews from
virtually every country in Western Europe in the succeeding centuries
but here in chronological order is a list of the evictions:

ENGLAND: Jews expelled in 1290 by Edward I. Not permitted to re-enter
till 1655.

FRANCE: Expelled in 1306 by Philip the Fair. A few were permitted to
return but were again evicted in 1394. Jewish settlements remained in
Bordeaux, Avignon, Marseilles, (from where they were evicted in 1682)
and in the northern province of Alsace.

SAXONY: Expelled in 1349.

HUNGARY: By 1092 the Jews were in control of Hungary's tax
collections. In 1360 they were expelled but later returned. In 1582
they were again expelled from the Christian part of Hungary.

BELGIUM: Expelled in 1370. A few settled there again in 1450, but no
large numbers came till 1700.

SLOVAKIA: Ousted from Prague in 1380. Many settled there again after
1562. In 1744 Marie Theresa expelled them again.

AUSTRIA: Expelled in 1420 by Albrecht V.

NETHERLANDS: Expelled from Utrecht in 1444.

SPAIN: Expelled in 1492.

LITHUANIA: Expelled in 1495 by Grand Duke Alexander. They later
returned.

PORTUGAL: Expelled in 1498.

PRUSSIA: Expelled in 1510.

ITALY: Expelled from Kingdom of Naples and Sardinia in 1540.

BAVARIA: Banned permanently in 1551.

Jews were not permitted to enter Sweden until 1782. None were
permitted to enter Denmark before the 17th century and they were not
allowed in Norway after 1814. Today only a handful reside in all
Scandinavia.

Back to Poland
By 1500 all of Western Europe except northern Italy, parts of Germany,
and the Papal possessions around Avignon, had been rid of the Jewish
invasion. For a while, at least, Europe was free of the Jews; not
until 1650 did they return in any numbers. Says Encyclopedia
Britannica: [page 57-58, vol. 13 - 1947.] "The great mass of the
Jewish people were thus to be found once more in the East, in the
Polish and Turkish empires . . The few communities suffered to remain
in western Europe were meanwhile subjected at last to all the
restrictions which earlier ages had usually allowed to remain as an
ideal; so that in a sense, the Jewish dark ages may be said to begin
with the Renaissance."

THE RENAISSANCE
As the Jew Departed ...
The period marked by the evictions-1300 to 1650-also marks the period
of the Renaissance which broke over Europe as the Jews departed.
Starting at first in the trading cities of northern Italy in about
1300, there began a great rebirth of culture and learning which at
first was based almost entirely on the writings of the ancient Greeks
and Romans. Very quickly this renascent culture spread over Europe and
when the age had ended, in about 1650, Europe was by comparison with
her former status, enlightened and civilized. Quite obviously all this
could not have taken place had it not been for a great upsurge of
commercial activity which occurred simultaneously with, and as an
adjunct of, the Renaissance. Not until the nations of Europe had
wrested commercial control from the ghetto did this rebirth of western
civilization occur.
Post by Day Brown
Likewise, Africans suffered under the slave trade by Moslems long
after the western nations gave it up. Agreed that the Jews are liars,
but that does not mean that everything they say is a lie. They need to
express some truth to retain their credibility.
http://www.silk-road.com/newsletter/vol3num2/5_bloom.php is one of the
sources to start with. Aryans began spreading out of Europe with the
domestication of the horse 6000 years ago, and appear in what is now
NW China 4000 years ago. Ever since then, the Aryan ancestors of the
Sogdians ran trade between China and Europe on what came to be known
as the Silk Road.
What we think of as the "Jews" were the merchant class, who collected
scriptures from many religions and translated them between 20
different languages including Sogdian, Tocharian, Chinese, Persian, &
Sanskrit. The ancestors of the Jews in control of the American media
were the Magi. They have been making money out of religion and
business for millennia, and they are damn good at it. The deserts of
Central Asia preserved many lost documents. The website above mentions
a mail bag that was found in the Kara Kum, which was lost in 331 AD.
With letters written on *paper*, which we didnt even know had been
invented yet. Many of which were in a feminine hand.
Many of the "Jews" now, and then, are nothing but front men. Its not
the Jews who are taking over, its the *Jewesses*. They are the
femonazis guys worry about. But they wont have you shot. If you make
enuf trouble, they'll put you on meds and send you home to your momma.
However, if they find you useful, then you'll get more pussy than you
ever imagined.
The USA govenment should be destroyed because it is ruled by
Jewesses. Certainly the Muslims have the best chance at bringing down
the Great Satan. It still looks pretty bad though.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Day Brown
2007-10-10 16:23:13 UTC
Permalink
Within a couple of generations after Trajan, all the shops in Rome
were owned by Jews, and Jews ran the bureacracy. The emperor expelled
them all from his government. Read Gibbon.

But then, the entire government came to a helt. Nobody could get deeds
processed, contracts notarized, and the courts could not process
criminal cases. The emperor had to hire all the Jews back or the
entire empire would have collapsed.

Now, Topaz, Just *who* do you propose to replace the Jews with? More
asinine stupid Christian fundies?

Alpha Man
2007-09-30 03:44:48 UTC
Permalink
X-No-Archive: yes
Post by Day Brown
Be that as it may, colleges are graduating more women, and more are
moving up the corporate ladder. Since women work for less than men,
they offer a lower cost of *management*; and since the cost of labor
is already trivial, that's the only way to increase *profits* for the
investors.
Feminism is a natural evolution of the capitalist global market, and
there's no way to put that genie back in the bottle. Get over it. Its
real simple. Might makes right. Always has, always will. Only now, the
brave heart, strong right arm, sword in hand, no longer cuts it. Smith
& Wesson guarantee equal rights for smart women, and all the rants
about it are pissing in the wind.
It is still the survival of the fittest. And the fittest now is not
the hero warrior, but the geek. Its the geek who created the software
and hardware you are using to post your rants. Hello?
Unfortunately for the geeks, these "powerful women" are carpet-munching
bulldykes. They won't touch a geek man, unless "he" had a very
successful sex-change operation.

Most of them will never have children anyway and therefore won't
contribute to the gene-pool at all. The universe will forget them.

Others may pick some prime sperm from a sperm-bank and they'd
certainly not pick geek sperm, but that of a blonde 6 foot+ tall,
Scandinavian muscle man with blue eyes.

Bad luck for geeks. But it's a biological fact. The alpha men do have
the good genes.

Alpha Man
Masculist
2007-09-29 18:24:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by w***@gmail.com
The extreamism of these google groups is extraordianary. In less than
a weeks time I've encountered a self-proclaimed pedophile who
rationalizes that adults are denying children valuable sexual
experiences,
I must have missed that post and I've been here ten years.
Post by w***@gmail.com
a mysoginist who claims society is on the verg of putting
all men in concentration camps for immediate destruction,
Now there's a visionary.
Post by w***@gmail.com
a holocost
denier (enough said),
Our man Topaz! He may have some funny ideas to some but he's great on
this women's issue!
Post by w***@gmail.com
and have already been branded an enemy for
attempting to present an actual balanced view.
"Balanced view" = "Moderate" = "Feminist". The subtleties of
contemporary politics don't escape us here at soc.men.
Post by w***@gmail.com
Do you all really
believe social recognition of your ideas will come from hidding away
in some obscure google group and spouting the most extream of all
possible spectrums??
We're mostly here for the fun and brotherhood at soc.men, but let's
face it "whys", this is the largest, oldest and most open men's group
in the world. Maybe no one is listening or cares, but maybe they
should?
Post by w***@gmail.com
BTW, I never stated there aren't social forces at work that are
putting men's very nature at risk. That is infact one of the first
things I said. There are militant feminist. Some of them are even
men. But one must be willing to choose their battles and recognize
the greatest enemy. For example, women who want equal pay for equal
work are not the real enemy. Nor do they seek the destruction of our
sex.
So says you but most of us here at soc.men see it otherwise.
Post by w***@gmail.com
They do however, call themselves feminists. Group them all
together and you create an insurmountable barrier of a perspective so
extream, few in society will try to examine its actually valid points.
"Extreme"? Feminism was "extreme" 35 years ago and now it's the
status quo.
Post by w***@gmail.com
Do as you will. No one is really listening. However, it could be
argued that some of you are going so far as to incite violence.
That's an argument that could be made in court. Carefull what you
wish for.
Hey "whys", to your feminist threat against free speech here I
respond, "Fuck you!" Anyway "whys", we've discussed that issue here
and are all to aware of both the ethical and legal limits of what we
say. Please let us know if we are going out of bounds. We always
want to know if we are legally or ethically offending Ms Man and will
gladly adjust our rhetoric if we are.
Post by w***@gmail.com
Oh, "whys" is a verb. Think about it. ;)
I must be dense. I don't get it.

Smitty
Post by w***@gmail.com
Post by Masculist
Oh jeeze, Alpha Man is acting like anti- feminist men could organize
and get money when in fact feminism serves the rich men who have the
money. Then we have in "Whysman" the equivalent of a holocaust denier
who says there is no powerful feminism and lastly we have a real
holocaust denier who says only the Nazi's can save us from feminism.
Let us all pray, "Dear God please save us from this scourge of
feminism?" Amen.
Smitty
Post by Topaz
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 04:29:59 +0200, "Alpha Man"
Post by Alpha Man
X-No-Archive: yes
Oh dear, guys. I'm trying to invite you to the alpha men group
since 4 months and all I get is some trolls making fun of the
alpha men movement posting their homoerotic crap on here.
Yeah, great. You men have a problem. You don't see in what
dangerous times we're living. Some of you may see it, but most men
are just whining or making fun of men who're complaining about
feminism.
But don't you see the signs? In the Western world, men are either
seen as sexual predators or criminals. Most unemployed people
are men. The feminist school system is destroying our boys.
Look, where does this lead? Men will be considered as "obsolete"
and "expendable", "worthless".Buchenwald for men! Yeah, guys,
I'm talking about the Holocaust.
For one thing the holo is Jew propaganda brought to you by the same
feminists and other scum who control your media. For another thing the
National Socialists completely wiped out feminism in Germany. And for
another thing feminism is Jewish.
The Jewish controlled media is for women and minorities. The same
propaganda against men is also found in the propaganda against White
people in general. It's fine to be against the feminists but let's
face it how much balls does that take. That is why you are made fun
of. If you also defended the White race in general you would be
showing some real balls. The most dangerous areas are the Black areas.
You should proudly say you don't want to live there.
And of course the main enemy are the ones who control the media and
control everything else. These are the Jews.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.orghttp://www.nsm88.com/
http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Topaz
2007-09-24 22:13:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Masculist
Oh jeeze, Alpha Man is acting like anti- feminist men could organize
and get money when in fact feminism serves the rich men who have the
money. Then we have in "Whysman" the equivalent of a holocaust denier
who says there is no powerful feminism and lastly we have a real
holocaust denier who says only the Nazi's can save us from feminism.
By Patrick Grimm
We hear daily of the alleged dangers of "Holocaust denial." We read in
newspapers the frightful scare-mongering, comparing those who deny
"global warming" to "Holocaust deniers." But I purport that there is
one form of denial truly more deadly to the survival of all nations
than any other. It is "Jew-denial."
Now you might say, no one denies that Jews exist, that they live among
us and have done quite well economically, sometimes honestly and other
times dishonestly. This is not what I refer to. "Jew-denial" or a
"Jew-denier" is a person, either uninformed or collusive with the
overclass, who denies the power of Jews in America and the world,
denies that their organized power has been corrosive (and many honest
Jews will admit that it is) and denies that Jews are a racial group
(their own words) who believe in their right to rule over the Goyim
(which means cattle). To deny all these things is only to ignore the
words of Jewish leaders and the words of the Jews' own holy books, the
Torah and the Talmud. It is also to jettison mountains of evidence and
decades of Jewish political activism.
But the Jew-deniers are everywhere, a ubiquitous dullard or deceptive
or deceived (take your pick) band of human beings. The Jew-deniers are
in our churches, in our governments, in our schools, in our military,
in our White House and in some of our own houses. Now I don't believe
these people should be jailed, imprisoned or fined for swallowing
false news or abetting the genocide the Jews are working to bring upon
us all, whites and Palestinians alike (the white is the Palestinian of
the European sphere), but they should be approached with caution,
mainly because a lifetime of brainwashing and hornswoggling can elicit
an animalistic reaction when one of these Jew-deniers is smacked in
the face with the truth.
The Jew-deniers (at least the lay ones) should be pitied rather than
stigmatized, though I do exactly that with this article and I deeply
apologize for that. But in all seriousness, they need help. They are
not mentally ill as the Jews call any person who disagrees with their
steamrolling of humanity. The Jew-deniers are misinformed and in need
of rescuing from a life of reckless disinfo which the media Jews will
be glad to force-feed them on a daily basis forever and ever if they
are willing to read the Jew newspapers and watch inane Jew newscasts
with reporters who are front men and front women for Big Jewry. These
types of medium masteries only perpetuate Jew-denial and breed more
little Jew-deniers, persons for whom the thought that Jewry could
desire anything but beneficence and ennoblement toward the Gentile
herds is a "canard" or a "libel", either bloody or bloodless, or an
"anti-Semitic" screed.
Present facts, statistics, troubling Israeli massacres, Talmudic
quotes, lists of ultra-liberal Jewish wheelers and dealers,
anti-Christian political action committees, discombobulating
historical accounts that show Jews as they are rather than as how they
dress themselves up for the camera, and a Jew-denier and those who are
card-carrying members of the Jew-denial movement that numbers in the
millions upon millions will spit out one or more replies taken from a
prepared list of oodles of Pavlovian conditioned retorts. For the sake
of brevity, here are just a select few:
1. You're an anti-Semite!

This one is easy to combat because most Jews are not Semites and many
non-Jews are. Most Jews are Khazars, Ashkenazi Khazars, so this
characterization (anti-Semite) is a real living, breathing canard.
Inform the Jew-denier of this reality and recommend Arthur Koestler's
book The Thirteenth Tribe for his/her perusal. Some Jew-deniers are
smart, while others don't read anything more intellectual than Harry
Potter novels. If this is the case, a sympathetic and platonic hug may
be in order.
2. Jews are "God's Chosen People"

If the Jew-denier is someone who believes in God, ask the Jew-denier
if God is indeed a racist of the crudest sort (though this is not to
say that racism defensively and properly understood is always a
negative). If the reply is a reflexive egalitarian 'no', and it will
be if this person goes to any Zionized, Judaized church in this
country, then ask the person if he/she honestly believes that God
would have sanctioned the killing of thousands upon thousands of
innocent human beings only for the purpose of having the Jews procure
their property, vineyards, wives, concubines, etc. Either God is a
genocidal maniac or the stories of the Old Testament are
Judahite-penned justifications of mass murder. It's one or the other.
This is not going to wash as an argument if you are talking to a
biblical literalist or one of those folks who believes that all
Scripture is "God-breathed" and "inerrant." If the Jew-denier
regularly sends financial love gifts to television evangelists, then
quietly walk away after shaking the dust from your Reeboks.
3. Jews are just members of one of the world's monotheistic
religions

Jews identify themselves as a "race", a "master race" superior to all
other races and destined to enslave the world. Jews consider
themselves a race, first and foremost. One helpful quote is in order:
"The former Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to
Jewish group in southern California said: 'If Israel had not come into
existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race
wouldn't have survived. I stand before you and say you must strengthen
your commitment to Israel.'" [1]
Judaism is a racial religion based on blood purity and conquest of the
Gentile as ordered by their holy books. This is not conspiracy theory.
This is basic Old Testament hermeneutics. I won't list all the verses
here where God tells the "Chosen People" that they are destined to
rule the world, but you can find them in your family Bible in books
like Deuteronomy and Numbers and present them to any Jew-deniers you
happen to run into.
CONCLUSION
Friends and countrymen, Jew-denial is an epidemic sweeping the world,
especially the American portion of it. Our churches are cranking out
little Judaized clones right off the conveyor Bible belt, ready to
parrot the words of Cyrus Scofield and John Hagee. Our governments are
rife with Judeophilic politicians scared to speak out about the Jewish
hijacking of our foreign policy. They attack those like Jim Moran,
even projecting Protocols of Zion conspiracies onto his temperate and
reasonable critiques of AIPAC and the Israel-First-Last-And-Always
Lobby. The Jew-denial movement is running wild in the United States!
It is ignoring the real issues, which are Jewish dual loyalty or
Israel-only loyalty, the Jewish machinations manipulating our currency
and economy and the debauching of our culture and the shattering of
our borders by galvanized Jews drunk and delirious with political
power and ruinous regency.
Should we prosecute the Jew-deniers, persecute the Jew-denial movement
on the internet, lock up its sycophants, lackeys and philo-Semitic
toadies and batter these simpletons in the streets with steel pipes
and tire irons? No, there's no use emulating the Jews.
We can only curb or put the kibosh on the Jew-denial movement by
spreading data far and wide on the web and to anyone who will listen
to the straight skinny on Jew supremacism and traitorous Jew antics.
The Jew-denial campaign has done quite a bang-up job deceiving and
misdirecting the energies of ordinary individuals (acolytes of
Jew-deniery) away from their true enemy and their greatest threat,
Jewish extremism and onto bogeymen like supposed white supremacists
and radical Islamists. Because of the popular front and font of lies
and anti-white disempowerment, most people are unaware or too
apathetic to even notice the Big Jewry Hidden Hand pouring our
liberties and our freedoms straight down the Talmudic drain.
To paraphrase the son of a rabbi and the creator of Communism, Karl
Marx "Jew-recognizers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose
but your high interest rates!"
[1] (Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/ Costa Mesa, Feb. 28, 2000, front
page)

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Loading...