Dale
2007-06-17 19:17:22 UTC
THE INTERNATIONAL MALE CONSPIRACY: A Final Revelation
This expose' may amount to the most heinous and massive betrayal in
the history of humanity; I am betraying the entire male gender.
For millennia, probably since the invention of walking, men have
happily pledged their fidelity to the most closely guarded of secrets.
As part of a world-wide conspiracy, one whose sole aim is the absolute
and never-ending subordination of the entire female gender, Every male
on the planet, every one, has promised to serve the cause faithfully
and to promote its masculine interests. But I must be the first to
break with the planetary tradition. I am a kind of Messiah for the New
Age, and hence expect to be reviled and scorned for the tidings I
bring. I must be the first for a couple of reasons.
Well, the first is not so much a justifying reason, as an excusing
condition. It's just that a few women, mainly sociologists, are on the
verge of figuring this out for themselves. The least I can do for the
brotherhood, if I am to betray it so monstrously, is to prevent a
woman from making the most important discovery of the last 1.5 million
years.
My second reason is better; I have come to really love women, and I
want to see their suffering end. This, of course, is a double-cross,
right at the heart of masculism. The international male conspiracy is
rooted in misogyny and sadism, as feminists have recently begun to
discern.
The facts surrounding this world conspiracy are really quite simple,
so simple, indeed, that it is a wonder that it took women so long to
suspect their sinister implications. One understands the dark and
malicious male plot if one understands one original fact: women once
ruled the earth. They were the first sex, genetically and
historically. Men were an evolutionary' afterthought. The evidence for
this is the diminutive and lowly Y chromosome. Because they were
inferior, in every existentially significant way, men were
systematically relegated to marginal functions and status, away from
the mainstreams of life.
Here the story' really begins. Small numbers of men, behind the backs
of their women, expressed discontent. Within a few centuries, the
phenomenon was international. Enclaves popped up on every continent
and, inevitably, the underground movement became a formal, fraternal
organization. The international male conspiracy was born.
The first world-wide congress convened in the Falkland Islands about
30,000 BC, and has met there annually ever since (the exact date is
unknown, since records were not maintained until about 3,500 BC, when
the movement invented writing as we now know it). This is why Britain
sent half its navy to rescue the Falklands; more than a few sheep were
at stake. The Admirals and Generals, all
of them men (who very cleverly brainwashed Margaret Thatcher into
doing their dirty work for them), knew that the planetary male
privilege was vulnerable.
In the 31,994-year period since the first Falkland Congress, the
conspiracy has had an unbroken record of stunning breakthroughs and
successes in its devoted efforts to dehumanize, humiliate,
subordinate, exploit. Oppress, enslave, disempower and terrorize
women. Year after year, these secret hives of patriarchy have produced
brilliant male inventions and subterfuges for keeping women in their
proper place as the pariahs of the planet.
I have just mentioned one. Men invented writing. After a few
centuries, they decided to teach it to a few women, but they did so in
such a way that they could never use it properly. This was the first
instrument of male dominance, and probably its most powerful one:
Control the means of communication and everything is yours. (In all
these examples, it should be noted that in the early stages of each
new development, men have used a small number of women as pawns in
their deadly machinations. They hypnotize these few to want what men
already have, thus giving all other women the mistaken idea that the
wish originates in females.)
So the teaching of disordered language to women was the first of many
steps toward their complete enslavement.
From there, it was not a long step toward the invention of reason,
logic and science. Again, some recent feminist writers have pointed
out that these are
exclusively male innovations, beautifully designed and implemented in
the interests of patriarchal power and privilege. They are absolutely
correct. They are tools of oppression and, consequently, these
feminists are on the right track when they abandon them entirely. But
what they do not know is how they work to male advantage. Here is a
case in point.
After men taught women how to read and how to 'write, they taught them
logic. This was in the fourth century BC. In fact, the proliferation
of reason in women
followed swiftly after Aristotle explained his principles of
syllogistic reasoning to the Falkland Congress of 3l8 BC. But we must
remember that teaching logic to women was part of a male conspiracy;
hence we must expect there to be a diabolic, crafty deception
involved. Indeed there was. The first stroke of male genius was to
recognize what feminists insist on:
Reason, logic and science are foreign to the female psyche. They are
inhospitable invaders in the earthy domains of emotion, fertility,
intuition and nurturance. I need not argue this, since feminists have
done it so well. Even more brilliant though was the decision to teach
one incomplete and inconsistent system of language and logic to women,
while reserving the most
fecund and efficacious systems for men. That is why, as all men know
after induction into the international conspiratorial brotherhood, men
speak and think in one system publicly and in another system among
themselves. The net result is that women, who are not constitutionally
disposed to thinking anyway (at least according to some of their
prominent ideologues), are chronically confused, making them
perpetually vulnerable to male oppression.
That is also why all major advances in thought have come from men.
Since they created reason, and since they have kept it to themselves,
only they know how to
use it. Male reason invented the wheel, the first spacecraft and
everything in between. This is all evidence for the feminist suspicion
that a male conspiracy is at work. Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas,
Copernicus, Descartes, Galileo, Newton, Kant, Darwin, Marx and
Einstein are a few cases in (I exclude all the performing and literary
arts, which is another story with the same plot.)
The second most potent strategy to issue from the Falkland Congresses
was the control of socialization. Men discovered that women could be
kept in perpetual servitude if they were socialized to it. Now that
men had control over language and logic, they did not encounter much
difficulty in getting control over the content of speaking and
thinking. Two socializing institutions proved particularly effective;
education and religion. The conspiracy controls both of them. One
provides the means and the other provides the motivation.
The unending oppression of women was guaranteed when men realized that
one key would lock women into their roles for good. Again, using few
well placed pawns, the conspiracy convinced women all over the world
that motherhood was their special privilege. They told women how to
socialize their children to male advantage and female disadvantage. By
now, the international male conspiracy had become a complete success:
it had the mothers in its spell. Alter this, it was not very difficult
to brainwash almost all women into accepting (and vehemently
defending) the Myth of Female Privilege. It took more than a few
Congresses to work out this subtle, sinister plot. In fact, it was
modified several times, and in the course of its fine-tuning, men came
as close as ever to accidentally revealing their conspiratorial
intentions.
The Myth plays upon the specious dignification, almost canonization,
of Motherhood. And since every woman is a potential or actual mother,
the men reasoned, why not hoodwink the entire sex into believing that
every woman is innately blessed with elevated status and privileges.
Millions of male martyrs have given up their lives and their seats on
the bus in order to preserve this myth in the minds of women.
The logic behind this epochal subterfuge is chillingly potent. By
granting a privileged status to women, men made them completely
vulnerable and dependent, standing in desperate need of physical
protection, the provision of life's necessities, and someone to tell
them what to think and what to feel. Naturally, male fascination with
female beauty and charm, the rhapsodic romanticization and
glorification of femininity, is all part of a conspiratorial
smokescreen. Hell, men have even convinced women that men need female
company, friendship and sympathy, to the extent that men are willing
to fork over truckloads of money to get and keep it.
As I said, many feminists are already familiar with my conspiracy
thesis and have gone so far as to promote it and provide empirical
support for it. But a
final, decisive piece of information is missing before the conspiracy
can be fully comprehended, and it is this missing link I intend to
reveal.
It is this: feminism itself It is the conspiracy's most deadly ploy.
Men have used feminism to divide and conquer women. Although it has
not caught on in every country, its effects have already been
staggering: Women are more disoriented and confused than even.
That feminism is a male invention is easy to see. It makes its first
recorded appearance in Plato's Republic, in which women were given
equality with men, especially in the army. Plato also argued for
universal day-care and the abolition of marriage and the family, both
tenets of contemporary radical feminism. But feminism did not really
catch on until more than 2,000 years later, because a small but
influential fringe group insisted that the strategy was simply too
cruel. This "Wimp Factor," after several centuries, was finally
declared undesirable when another Falkland Congress voted to increase
men's efforts to confound women with feminist dogma.
Two delegates to the 1867 Congress, Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill,
later produced documents which were to become the ideological platform
for contemporary feminism. Not long after that, men manipulated women
into believing they wanted to vote and, presto, women were on the road
to equality with men. This, of course, was a most tragic step for
women and a thoroughly conclusive victory for the male conspiracy,
dazzling in its deception and execution.
One pivotal conception makes the conspiracy's exploitation of feminism
comprehensible, namely that men have collectively convinced women that
they should be more like men. But of course they can't, because the
tools of masculinity are the tools of oppression, and they are all in
the hands of the world conspiracy. So women are caught in a
debilitating contradiction They shouldn't be women and they can't be
men. Game over.
Let us examine just a few examples which demonstrate how the cunning
conspirators have turned feminism, that most elegant of all male
contrivances, to their own advantage.
First, under the banner buzz-word of "EQUALITY," the conspirators
beguiled women into thinking that one way they could he more like men
would be to behave more like men, sexually. "Cast off your traditional
shackles of modest femininity:" they hinted, "and liberate your loins.
Be free with your sexuality." So women discarded their bras, male
Invention, much to the delight of men; they devoured birth-control
pills, much to the relief of men who invented them; and they provided
lots of uncommitted sex, much to the satisfaction of men.
Second, women tried to become more like men by relieving men of much
of their traditional drudgery and stupid work. Once women became
convinced that they could be equal, men tamed this idea against them
and demanded that they share equal obligations. "Provide for yourself'
became part of men's private language, so that larger numbers of
families were headed by women alone. And, of course, their economic
hardship made them particularly vulnerable to other male predators.
The conspiracy wins again.
Third, and this fact is still incipient, women are beginning to accept
the idea that they can do all the fighting and killing. Men are still
waiting for their feminists to promote this idea with greater force,
although Canada has now graduated its first female combat pilots. The
conspiracy will savor its most delicious moment when every police
force, fire department and armed service is peopled by females. This
will be the greatest Victory of all: Women will he doing all the
working and fighting while men spend all their time fishing and
plotting. Men will even be relieved of domestic drudgery, because they
have convinced a number of very vocal women that fathers are
constitutionally incapable of parenting.
Brotherhood, you see, is powerful. The total destruction of womanhood
is by now virtually accomplished. But this fact contains an alarming
thought, which has been aired with increasing frequency at the last
few International Congresses. The fact is, men may have run out of
misogynist strategies! How do they top their invention of feminism
without resorting to old and obvious tricks? The situation is clearly
distressing.
As I said at the outset, my main reason for revealing all these
conspiratorial secrets, for which I expect to pay dearly at the
blood-thirsty hands of the Brotherhood, is that I love women with
abundance and without shame. And if men are running out of strategies,
I am fearful of what they might do next out of sheer desperation.
There seems to be only one sure escape from the encroaching horrors
women face. Let us just describe it as creative counter-conspiracy. It
is the most potent retaliatory measure currently available to women.
In effect, it deploys all the conspiratorial weapons men have hitherto
used with such undisputed success. And
since the weapons are conspiratorial ones, their effective deployment
presupposes one absolute, inviolable condition: Women must conspire in
total secrecy. This is crucially important.
It is beyond doubt that any female conspiracy will succeed only if it
is carried out in the same way men did it: privately, secretly,
silently. Any attempt to enlist male co-operation or support will
torpedo the first launch. Then women will be ruined forever.
Duplicity is the core of conspiracy. Hence, I suggest that women,
without Delay, undertake the revamping of Western Civilization in
toto, replacing male language, logic, science, religion, art,
philosophy, education, economics, politics, industrialism, technology
and the family with female institutions completely incomprehensible to
men. But every step, everyone, must he diabolically concealed from men
and ruthlessly executed with legerdemain, fraud, seduction,
prevarication, mystification and a satanically-false appearance of
sincerity and goodwill.
Only by doing this will women achieve reparation and revenge for the
grotesque suffering and indignities perpetrated upon them over the
past 30,000 years by the Male Conspiracy. But, sadly, by doing this
women will also intensify what some take to be the natural state of
relations between the sexes: fear, hatred, suspicion, envy,
competition and war. And, more sadly, it will make it nearly
impossible for anyone trying to break free from such patent insanity
to do so.
This expose' may amount to the most heinous and massive betrayal in
the history of humanity; I am betraying the entire male gender.
For millennia, probably since the invention of walking, men have
happily pledged their fidelity to the most closely guarded of secrets.
As part of a world-wide conspiracy, one whose sole aim is the absolute
and never-ending subordination of the entire female gender, Every male
on the planet, every one, has promised to serve the cause faithfully
and to promote its masculine interests. But I must be the first to
break with the planetary tradition. I am a kind of Messiah for the New
Age, and hence expect to be reviled and scorned for the tidings I
bring. I must be the first for a couple of reasons.
Well, the first is not so much a justifying reason, as an excusing
condition. It's just that a few women, mainly sociologists, are on the
verge of figuring this out for themselves. The least I can do for the
brotherhood, if I am to betray it so monstrously, is to prevent a
woman from making the most important discovery of the last 1.5 million
years.
My second reason is better; I have come to really love women, and I
want to see their suffering end. This, of course, is a double-cross,
right at the heart of masculism. The international male conspiracy is
rooted in misogyny and sadism, as feminists have recently begun to
discern.
The facts surrounding this world conspiracy are really quite simple,
so simple, indeed, that it is a wonder that it took women so long to
suspect their sinister implications. One understands the dark and
malicious male plot if one understands one original fact: women once
ruled the earth. They were the first sex, genetically and
historically. Men were an evolutionary' afterthought. The evidence for
this is the diminutive and lowly Y chromosome. Because they were
inferior, in every existentially significant way, men were
systematically relegated to marginal functions and status, away from
the mainstreams of life.
Here the story' really begins. Small numbers of men, behind the backs
of their women, expressed discontent. Within a few centuries, the
phenomenon was international. Enclaves popped up on every continent
and, inevitably, the underground movement became a formal, fraternal
organization. The international male conspiracy was born.
The first world-wide congress convened in the Falkland Islands about
30,000 BC, and has met there annually ever since (the exact date is
unknown, since records were not maintained until about 3,500 BC, when
the movement invented writing as we now know it). This is why Britain
sent half its navy to rescue the Falklands; more than a few sheep were
at stake. The Admirals and Generals, all
of them men (who very cleverly brainwashed Margaret Thatcher into
doing their dirty work for them), knew that the planetary male
privilege was vulnerable.
In the 31,994-year period since the first Falkland Congress, the
conspiracy has had an unbroken record of stunning breakthroughs and
successes in its devoted efforts to dehumanize, humiliate,
subordinate, exploit. Oppress, enslave, disempower and terrorize
women. Year after year, these secret hives of patriarchy have produced
brilliant male inventions and subterfuges for keeping women in their
proper place as the pariahs of the planet.
I have just mentioned one. Men invented writing. After a few
centuries, they decided to teach it to a few women, but they did so in
such a way that they could never use it properly. This was the first
instrument of male dominance, and probably its most powerful one:
Control the means of communication and everything is yours. (In all
these examples, it should be noted that in the early stages of each
new development, men have used a small number of women as pawns in
their deadly machinations. They hypnotize these few to want what men
already have, thus giving all other women the mistaken idea that the
wish originates in females.)
So the teaching of disordered language to women was the first of many
steps toward their complete enslavement.
From there, it was not a long step toward the invention of reason,
logic and science. Again, some recent feminist writers have pointed
out that these are
exclusively male innovations, beautifully designed and implemented in
the interests of patriarchal power and privilege. They are absolutely
correct. They are tools of oppression and, consequently, these
feminists are on the right track when they abandon them entirely. But
what they do not know is how they work to male advantage. Here is a
case in point.
After men taught women how to read and how to 'write, they taught them
logic. This was in the fourth century BC. In fact, the proliferation
of reason in women
followed swiftly after Aristotle explained his principles of
syllogistic reasoning to the Falkland Congress of 3l8 BC. But we must
remember that teaching logic to women was part of a male conspiracy;
hence we must expect there to be a diabolic, crafty deception
involved. Indeed there was. The first stroke of male genius was to
recognize what feminists insist on:
Reason, logic and science are foreign to the female psyche. They are
inhospitable invaders in the earthy domains of emotion, fertility,
intuition and nurturance. I need not argue this, since feminists have
done it so well. Even more brilliant though was the decision to teach
one incomplete and inconsistent system of language and logic to women,
while reserving the most
fecund and efficacious systems for men. That is why, as all men know
after induction into the international conspiratorial brotherhood, men
speak and think in one system publicly and in another system among
themselves. The net result is that women, who are not constitutionally
disposed to thinking anyway (at least according to some of their
prominent ideologues), are chronically confused, making them
perpetually vulnerable to male oppression.
That is also why all major advances in thought have come from men.
Since they created reason, and since they have kept it to themselves,
only they know how to
use it. Male reason invented the wheel, the first spacecraft and
everything in between. This is all evidence for the feminist suspicion
that a male conspiracy is at work. Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas,
Copernicus, Descartes, Galileo, Newton, Kant, Darwin, Marx and
Einstein are a few cases in (I exclude all the performing and literary
arts, which is another story with the same plot.)
The second most potent strategy to issue from the Falkland Congresses
was the control of socialization. Men discovered that women could be
kept in perpetual servitude if they were socialized to it. Now that
men had control over language and logic, they did not encounter much
difficulty in getting control over the content of speaking and
thinking. Two socializing institutions proved particularly effective;
education and religion. The conspiracy controls both of them. One
provides the means and the other provides the motivation.
The unending oppression of women was guaranteed when men realized that
one key would lock women into their roles for good. Again, using few
well placed pawns, the conspiracy convinced women all over the world
that motherhood was their special privilege. They told women how to
socialize their children to male advantage and female disadvantage. By
now, the international male conspiracy had become a complete success:
it had the mothers in its spell. Alter this, it was not very difficult
to brainwash almost all women into accepting (and vehemently
defending) the Myth of Female Privilege. It took more than a few
Congresses to work out this subtle, sinister plot. In fact, it was
modified several times, and in the course of its fine-tuning, men came
as close as ever to accidentally revealing their conspiratorial
intentions.
The Myth plays upon the specious dignification, almost canonization,
of Motherhood. And since every woman is a potential or actual mother,
the men reasoned, why not hoodwink the entire sex into believing that
every woman is innately blessed with elevated status and privileges.
Millions of male martyrs have given up their lives and their seats on
the bus in order to preserve this myth in the minds of women.
The logic behind this epochal subterfuge is chillingly potent. By
granting a privileged status to women, men made them completely
vulnerable and dependent, standing in desperate need of physical
protection, the provision of life's necessities, and someone to tell
them what to think and what to feel. Naturally, male fascination with
female beauty and charm, the rhapsodic romanticization and
glorification of femininity, is all part of a conspiratorial
smokescreen. Hell, men have even convinced women that men need female
company, friendship and sympathy, to the extent that men are willing
to fork over truckloads of money to get and keep it.
As I said, many feminists are already familiar with my conspiracy
thesis and have gone so far as to promote it and provide empirical
support for it. But a
final, decisive piece of information is missing before the conspiracy
can be fully comprehended, and it is this missing link I intend to
reveal.
It is this: feminism itself It is the conspiracy's most deadly ploy.
Men have used feminism to divide and conquer women. Although it has
not caught on in every country, its effects have already been
staggering: Women are more disoriented and confused than even.
That feminism is a male invention is easy to see. It makes its first
recorded appearance in Plato's Republic, in which women were given
equality with men, especially in the army. Plato also argued for
universal day-care and the abolition of marriage and the family, both
tenets of contemporary radical feminism. But feminism did not really
catch on until more than 2,000 years later, because a small but
influential fringe group insisted that the strategy was simply too
cruel. This "Wimp Factor," after several centuries, was finally
declared undesirable when another Falkland Congress voted to increase
men's efforts to confound women with feminist dogma.
Two delegates to the 1867 Congress, Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill,
later produced documents which were to become the ideological platform
for contemporary feminism. Not long after that, men manipulated women
into believing they wanted to vote and, presto, women were on the road
to equality with men. This, of course, was a most tragic step for
women and a thoroughly conclusive victory for the male conspiracy,
dazzling in its deception and execution.
One pivotal conception makes the conspiracy's exploitation of feminism
comprehensible, namely that men have collectively convinced women that
they should be more like men. But of course they can't, because the
tools of masculinity are the tools of oppression, and they are all in
the hands of the world conspiracy. So women are caught in a
debilitating contradiction They shouldn't be women and they can't be
men. Game over.
Let us examine just a few examples which demonstrate how the cunning
conspirators have turned feminism, that most elegant of all male
contrivances, to their own advantage.
First, under the banner buzz-word of "EQUALITY," the conspirators
beguiled women into thinking that one way they could he more like men
would be to behave more like men, sexually. "Cast off your traditional
shackles of modest femininity:" they hinted, "and liberate your loins.
Be free with your sexuality." So women discarded their bras, male
Invention, much to the delight of men; they devoured birth-control
pills, much to the relief of men who invented them; and they provided
lots of uncommitted sex, much to the satisfaction of men.
Second, women tried to become more like men by relieving men of much
of their traditional drudgery and stupid work. Once women became
convinced that they could be equal, men tamed this idea against them
and demanded that they share equal obligations. "Provide for yourself'
became part of men's private language, so that larger numbers of
families were headed by women alone. And, of course, their economic
hardship made them particularly vulnerable to other male predators.
The conspiracy wins again.
Third, and this fact is still incipient, women are beginning to accept
the idea that they can do all the fighting and killing. Men are still
waiting for their feminists to promote this idea with greater force,
although Canada has now graduated its first female combat pilots. The
conspiracy will savor its most delicious moment when every police
force, fire department and armed service is peopled by females. This
will be the greatest Victory of all: Women will he doing all the
working and fighting while men spend all their time fishing and
plotting. Men will even be relieved of domestic drudgery, because they
have convinced a number of very vocal women that fathers are
constitutionally incapable of parenting.
Brotherhood, you see, is powerful. The total destruction of womanhood
is by now virtually accomplished. But this fact contains an alarming
thought, which has been aired with increasing frequency at the last
few International Congresses. The fact is, men may have run out of
misogynist strategies! How do they top their invention of feminism
without resorting to old and obvious tricks? The situation is clearly
distressing.
As I said at the outset, my main reason for revealing all these
conspiratorial secrets, for which I expect to pay dearly at the
blood-thirsty hands of the Brotherhood, is that I love women with
abundance and without shame. And if men are running out of strategies,
I am fearful of what they might do next out of sheer desperation.
There seems to be only one sure escape from the encroaching horrors
women face. Let us just describe it as creative counter-conspiracy. It
is the most potent retaliatory measure currently available to women.
In effect, it deploys all the conspiratorial weapons men have hitherto
used with such undisputed success. And
since the weapons are conspiratorial ones, their effective deployment
presupposes one absolute, inviolable condition: Women must conspire in
total secrecy. This is crucially important.
It is beyond doubt that any female conspiracy will succeed only if it
is carried out in the same way men did it: privately, secretly,
silently. Any attempt to enlist male co-operation or support will
torpedo the first launch. Then women will be ruined forever.
Duplicity is the core of conspiracy. Hence, I suggest that women,
without Delay, undertake the revamping of Western Civilization in
toto, replacing male language, logic, science, religion, art,
philosophy, education, economics, politics, industrialism, technology
and the family with female institutions completely incomprehensible to
men. But every step, everyone, must he diabolically concealed from men
and ruthlessly executed with legerdemain, fraud, seduction,
prevarication, mystification and a satanically-false appearance of
sincerity and goodwill.
Only by doing this will women achieve reparation and revenge for the
grotesque suffering and indignities perpetrated upon them over the
past 30,000 years by the Male Conspiracy. But, sadly, by doing this
women will also intensify what some take to be the natural state of
relations between the sexes: fear, hatred, suspicion, envy,
competition and war. And, more sadly, it will make it nearly
impossible for anyone trying to break free from such patent insanity
to do so.